Mathematics of Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 28, No. 1, February 2003, pp. 1-38
DOI: 10.1287/moor.28.1.1.14260
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, D.
Right arrow Articles by Iyengar, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Robust Portfolio Selection Problems

D. Goldfarb, G. Iyengar

IEOR Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
IEOR Department, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027

gold(ieor.columbia.edu
garud(ieor.columbia.edu

In this paper we show how to formulate and solve robust portfolio selection problems. The objective of these robust formulations is to systematically combat the sensitivity of the optimal portfolio to statistical and modeling errors in the estimates of the relevant market parameters. We introduce "uncertainty structures" for the market parameters and show that the robust portfolio selection problems corresponding to these uncertainty structures can be reformulated as secondorder cone programs and, therefore, the computational effort required to solve them is comparable to that required for solving convex quadratic programs. Moreover, we show that these uncertainty structures correspond to confidence regions associated with the statistical procedures employed to estimate the market parameters. Finally, we demonstrate a simple recipe for efficiently computing robust portfolios given raw market data and a desired level of confidence.

Key Words: Robust optimization; mean-variance portfolio selection; value-at-risk portfolio selection; second-order cone programming; linear regression
History: Received: January 1, 2002; revision received: May 25, 2002;revision received: July 24, 2002;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
P. Bonami and M. A. Lejeune
An Exact Solution Approach for Portfolio Optimization Problems Under Stochastic and Integer Constraints
Operations Research, May 1, 2009; 57(3): 650 - 670.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
V. DeMiguel and F. J. Nogales
Portfolio Selection with Robust Estimation
Operations Research, May 1, 2009; 57(3): 560 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REV FINANC STUDHome page
V. DeMiguel, L. Garlappi, and R. Uppal
Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy?
Rev. Financ. Stud., May 1, 2009; 22(5): 1915 - 1953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Review of FinanceHome page
F. Lutgens and P. C. Schotman
Robust Portfolio Optimisation with Multiple Experts
Review of Finance, December 25, 2008; (2008) rfn028v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
A. Atamturk and M. Zhang
Two-Stage Robust Network Flow and Design Under Demand Uncertainty
Operations Research, July 1, 2007; 55(4): 662 - 673.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
A. E. B. Lim and J. G. Shanthikumar
Relative Entropy, Exponential Utility, and Robust Dynamic Pricing
Operations Research, March 1, 2007; 55(2): 198 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
I. Popescu
Robust Mean-Covariance Solutions for Stochastic Optimization
Operations Research, January 1, 2007; 55(1): 98 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
F. Lutgens, J. Sturm, and A. Kolen
Robust One-Period Option Hedging
Operations Research, November 1, 2006; 54(6): 1051 - 1062.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mathematics of Operations ResearchHome page
G. N. Iyengar
Robust Dynamic Programming
Mathematics of Operations Research, May 1, 2005; 30(2): 257 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.